Journal Recommendation
Selecting a reputable journal in which to present your work is an important step for a successful publication strategy. Some research fields have thousands of journals, and most authors find the selection process difficult. Choosing the wrong journal can mean rejection or a long review, both of which delay publication. With LetPub’s Journal Recommendation service, papers are matched to editors with relevant subject matter expertise. All of our editors are frequently invited to serve as reviewers by scientific journals and they have experience publishing and reviewing articles of all types (e.g., original research, reviews, case reports, surveys, and short communications). They have advanced degrees (PhD and MD) or professional and educational backgrounds, and there is an editor for every discipline, such as clinical medicine, chemistry, physics, engineering, life sciences, and social sciences. They will assess the key scientific factors in your manuscript and recommend suitable journals to ensure an efficient publication process.
Our track record allows us to offer the following guarantee: If the first 3 recommendations do not meet the needs you specify at the time service purchase, we will provide 2 complimentary recommendations to supplement your target journal selection list.
Any author-specified restrictions, including index restrictions, may limit the options that can be provided or require concessions to other parameters of the recommendation process. Recommendation of a journal does not guarantee acceptance. Rejection is entirely at the discretion of the journal and may occur for a variety of reasons for which LetPub does not hold responsibility, including being out of scope. For further information, see our FAQ.
Loading......
The English editor (scientific editor) not only polished the English of our manuscript, including grammar, punctuation, and overall readability, but also significantly contributed to the academic expression by providing constructive feedback on the paper's framework, constituent elements, results, and conclusions. This included appropriately compressing lengthy or repetitive sections, suggesting structural modifications, identifying ambiguous passages, rewriting academic descriptions, questioning certain statements in the paper, and offering constructive academic suggestions. All of these insights and assistance have been very inspiring and helpful for us as authors. Thank you very much to the editor.